Q95 — AWS SAA-C03 Ch.16

Question 95 of 100 | ← Chapter 16

Q1295. A company wants a flexible compute solution that includes Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Fargate. The company does not want to commit to multi-year contracts.Which purchasing option will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Correct Answer: B. Purchase a 1-year Compute Savings Plan with the No Upfront option.

Explanation

Let's analyze each option based on the requirements of the company, which wants a flexible compute solution covering both Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Fargate without committing to multi - year contracts and aiming for cost - effectiveness:Option A: Purchase a 1 - year EC2 Instance Savings Plan with the All Upfront option Limitation of coverage: An EC2 Instance Savings Plan is specifically designed for Amazon EC2 instances. It does not cover AWS Fargate, which is a serverless compute engine for containers. Since the company requires a solution that includes both EC2 and Fargate, this option does not meet the full requirements. Upfront cost: The All Upfront option requires paying the entire cost of the Savings Plan upfront. While this can lead to significant savings in the long run, it ties up a large amount of capital at once and does not align with the company's preference for flexibility in terms of upfront commitments. Option B: Purchase a 1 - year Compute Savings Plan with the No Upfront option Coverage: A Compute Savings Plan is more flexible than an EC2 Instance Savings Plan. It can be applied to both Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Fargate, which meets the company's requirement of having a solution that covers both services.Upfront commitment: The No Upfront option allows the company to use the compute resources without making any upfront payment. Instead, they pay a lower hourly rate compared to the on - demand price over the 1 - year term. This provides the company with the flexibility it desires as there is no large initial financial outlay, and it avoids multi - year contracts.Cost - effectiveness: Compared to on - demand pricing, a Compute Savings Plan with the No Upfront option offers cost savings while maintaining flexibility, making it a cost - effective choice for the company's needs.Option C: Purchase a 1 - year Compute Savings Plan with the Partial Upfront option Coverage: Similar to Option B, a Compute Savings Plan covers both EC2 and Fargate, so it meets the service coverage requirement.Upfront commitment: The Partial Upfront option requires the company to make a partial upfront payment. While this can lead to slightly higher savings compared to the No Upfront option, it still involves an upfront financial commitment. The company has expressed a preference for no upfront commitments, so this option is less suitable in terms of flexibility.Option D: Purchase a 1 - year Compute Savings Plan with the All Upfront option Coverage: A Compute Savings Plan covers both EC2 and Fargate, meeting the service requirement. Upfront commitment: The All Upfront option requires the company to pay the entire cost of the Savings Plan upfront. This goes against the company's desire for flexibility as it ties up a significant amount of capital at the start of the 1 - year term.Based on the above analysis, the most cost - effective purchasing option that meets the company's requirements of flexibility, coverage of both EC2 and Fargate, and no multi - year contracts is to purchase a 1 - year Compute Savings Plan with the No Upfront option.So, the answer is B.