Q97 — AWS SAA-C03 Ch.15

Question 97 of 100 | ← Chapter 15

Q1197. Amedia company is using video conversion tools that run on Amazon EC2 instances. The video conversion tools run on a combination of Windows EC2 instances and Linux EC2 instances.Each video file is tens of gigabytes in size.The video conversion tools must process the video files in the shortest possible amount of time. The company needs a single, centralized file storage solution that can be mounted on all the EC2 instances that host the video conversion tools.Which solution will meet these requirements?

Correct Answer: C. Deploy Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) with Max I/O performance mode.

Explanation

To meet the requirements of the media company, which include processing large video files (tens of gigabytes in size) in the shortest possible time and having a single, centralized file storage solution that can be mounted on both Windows and Linux EC2 instances, the most suitable solution is:C. Deploy Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) with Max I/O performance mode.Explanation:Centralized File Storage for Both Windows and Linux:Amazon EFS is a fully managed, scalable, and highly available file storage service that is compatible with both Windows and Linux EC2 instances. It provides a simple, scalable, and fully managed elastic NFS file system that can be mounted on multiple EC2 instances simultaneously, making it ideal for a centralized storage solution.High Performance for Large Video Files:Max I/O Performance Mode: This mode is designed for applications that require high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with the ability to scale to tens of thousands of concurrent NFS clients. Given that video conversion tools need to process large files quickly and efficiently, the Max I/O performance mode of Amazon EFS can provide the necessary throughput and IOPS to handle the workload effectively.Comparison with Other Options:A. Deploy Amazon FSx for Windows File Server with HDD storage:Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is optimized for Windows workloads and may not be the best choice for a mixed environment of Windows and Linux instances. Additionally, HDD storage is generally slower than SSD storage and may not provide the performance needed for large video file processing. B. Deploy Amazon FSx for Windows File Server with SSD storage:While SSD storage offers better performance than HDD, Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is still primarily designed for Windows workloads. The requirement for a single, centralized storage solution that works with both Windows and Linux instances makes Amazon EFS a more suitable choice. D. Deploy Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) with General Purpose performance mode:While Amazon EFS with General Purpose performance mode is suitable for a wide range of workloads, it may not provide the same level of aggregate throughput and IOPS as the Max I/O performance mode. For large video file processing, where high throughput and IOPS are critical, the Max I/O performance mode is a better choice.Conclusion:Deploying Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) with Max I/O performance mode meets the requirements of the media company by providing a single, centralized file storage solution that is compatible with both Windows and Linux EC2 instances and offers the high performance needed for processing large video files quickly and efficiently.