Q49 — AWS SAA-C03 Ch.14

Question 49 of 100 | ← Chapter 14

Q1049. A company runs its media rendering application on premises. The company wants to reduce storage costs and has moved all data to Amazon S3. The on-premises rendering application needs low-latency access to storage.The company needs to design a storage solution for the application. The storage solution must maintain the desired application performance.Which storage solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?

Correct Answer: B. Configure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.

Explanation

To provide low-latency access to storage for the on-premises media rendering application while keeping costs manageable, the best solution is:B. Configure an Amazon S3 File Gateway to provide storage for the on-premises application.Explanation:\1. Amazon S3 File Gateway: - The S3 File Gateway allows on-premises applications to access Amazon S3 as a file system. It provides a low-latency caching solution that maintains frequently accessed data locally while storing the rest in S3. This setup ensures that the application can access data quickly, reducing latency.\2. Cost-Effectiveness: - By using the S3 File Gateway, you benefit from the cost-effective storage of S3 while ensuring that only the necessary data is cached locally. This minimizes the need for expensive on-premises storage solutions.\3. Performance: - The S3 File Gateway caches data locally, which helps maintain the desired application performance by allowing quick access to frequently used data.Evaluation of Other Options:A. Use Mountpoint for Amazon S3 to access the data in Amazon S3 for the on-premises application: - Mountpoint provides a way to mount S3 as a file system but may not deliver the same level of performance and caching capabilities needed for low-latency access compared to the S3 File Gateway.C. Copy the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: - This option introduces additional complexity and cost. FSx is useful for specific use cases but may not be necessary if the S3 File Gateway can meet performance needs directly.D. Configure an on-premises file server and use the Amazon S3 API: - This approach requires more management overhead and may not provide the low-latency access needed for the rendering application. Additionally, relying on the S3 API can introduce latency compared to using a more integrated solution like the S3 File Gateway.Conclusion:Option B is the most suitable solution, providing low-latency access while leveraging the cost-effectiveness of Amazon S3 storage.