Q83 — AWS SAA-C03 Ch.13

Question 83 of 100 | ← Chapter 13

Q983. A company is rebuilding its storage infrastructure to accommodate a growing volume of structured data, such as customer records,and unstructured data, such as medical images and diagnostic reports.The storage solution must provide data integrity,high availability,and instant data retrieval.Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

Correct Answer: B. Use Amazon S3 Standard to store both structured data and unstructured data.

Explanation

The correct answer is:B. Use Amazon S3 Standard to store both structured data and unstructured data.Explanation:A. Use Amazon RDS for MySQL to store structured data. Use Amazon FSx for Lustre to store the unstructured data.- This solution would be more expensive compared to using Amazon S3. RDS and FSx incur higher costs than S3 for storage and data retrieval.B. Use Amazon S3 Standard to store both structured data and unstructured data.- This is the most cost-effective solution that meets the requirements.- Amazon S3 provides high availability, durability, and instant data retrieval for both structured and unstructured data.- S3 Standard is a cost-effective storage option for a wide range of data types, including structured data like customer records and unstructured data like medical images.- S3 also provides built-in data integrity features, such as data checksums and versioning, to ensure data integrity.C. Create Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volumes to store both structured data and unstructured data.- This solution would be more expensive than using Amazon S3, as EBS incurs higher storage and data retrieval costs.- EBS is better suited for use cases that require low-latency, block-level storage, such as for database workloads or virtual machine root volumes.D. Use Amazon RDS for MySQL to store structured data. Use Amazon S3 Glacier to store the unstructured data.- This solution would be more expensive than using S3 Standard for both structured and unstructured data.- Glacier is a lower-cost storage option, but it has higher data retrieval costs and longer retrieval times, which may not meet the instant data retrieval requirement.Therefore, the most cost-effective solution that meets the requirements is to use Amazon S3 Standard to store both structured and unstructured data.